- Reference speech material: 48kHz vs. 8kHz sampling frequency
- MOS-LQO output: POLQA score directly represents estimated MOS values on a subjective scale of 1 to 5 MOS, unlike PESQ, which used the P.862.1 mapping function for conversion to the MOS domain
- Dual operational modes:
- Narrowband NB (IRS filtering up to 3.4kHz; 8kHz sampling frequency of the reference sample) For backwards compatibility to PESQ — recommended to berun only for this scope
- Super wideband SWB (Flat filtering up to 14kHz, 48kHz sampling frequencyof the reference sample)
- Unique triple bandwidth output scale:
- SWB mode: NB, WB, and SWB tested samples presented on a single SWBscale (bandwidth being part of the transmission chain’s degradation)
- This has the advantage of direct comparison of different bandwidth scores. NOTE: It is generally expected that the SWB unique scale (running a SWB reference sample) has the following transparency:
- • NB: Maximum MOS value 4.25
- • WB: Maximum MOS value 4.5
- • SWB: Maximum MOS value 4.75
- New extensively tested and validated languages: Chinese, Japanese, Czech
- Accuracy: POLQA proven to over-perform PESQ (both NB and WB)
Reference speech material: 48kHz vs. 8kHz sampling frequency MOS-LQO output: POLQA score directly represents estimated MOS values on a...
Main differences between POLQA and PESQ
The move from PESQ to POLQA is recommended (and will eventually be required) due to: POLQA fixes well-known weaknesses of PESQ POLQA...
Why moving the PESQ to POLQA is recommended
The move from PESQ to POLQA is recommended (and will eventually be
required) due to:
POLQA fixes well-known weaknesses of PESQ
POLQA copes with today’s speech codecs, voice enhancement devices,
and network conditions
POLQA offers significantly higher accuracy
POLQA technology has still some limitations that must be well understood and
controlled
required) due to:
POLQA fixes well-known weaknesses of PESQ
POLQA copes with today’s speech codecs, voice enhancement devices,
and network conditions
POLQA offers significantly higher accuracy
POLQA technology has still some limitations that must be well understood and
controlled
Main differences between POLQA and PESQ: Reference speech sampling frequency Operational modes / bandwidths Unique triple bandwidt...
Main differences between POLQA and PESQ
Main differences between POLQA and PESQ:
Reference speech sampling frequency
Operational modes / bandwidths
Unique triple bandwidth MOS LQO output scale
Accuracy
Reference speech sampling frequency
Operational modes / bandwidths
Unique triple bandwidth MOS LQO output scale
Accuracy
Reason 1. POLQA fixes known and recognized PESQ weaknesses. WB measurements in general Inaccuracy with CDMA codecs (e.g., EVRC) and, th...
Why move from PESQ to POLQA
Reason 1. POLQA fixes known and recognized PESQ weaknesses.
- WB measurements in general
- Inaccuracy with CDMA codecs (e.g., EVRC) and, therefore,
- CDMA networks in general
- Sensitivity to certain GSM/WCDMA network conditions
- (DTX/Voice Activity Detection in AMR codec)
- VoIP limitations (variable delay up to 1sec)
- Strong linear distortions (e.g., phone’s frequency shaping) as well as gain variations
- Limitations with speech processing (enhancement) devices
- (noise reduction, automatic gain control)
Reason 2. POLQA has new operational features.
Works in all three available bandwidths (NB, WB, SWB) and under different
background noise conditions (street, car, restaurant, babble, impulse, etc.)
Works with all new commercial and standardized codecs used in different
technologies (GSM/WCDMA, LTE, VoIP, VoIP over IMS) such as
AMR-WB, EVRC-WB, iLBC, AMB+, AAC, Skype / SLIK, G.711, G.729, etc.
Allows measurements at various combinations of interfaces:
electrical-electrical, acoustical-acoustical, electrical-acoustical, and
acoustical-electrical — providing the opportunity to test terminals and
hands-free applications
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Follow Us
Were this world an endless plain, and by sailing eastward we could for ever reach new distances